Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Background: Aerobic exercise is recommended during stroke rehabilitation to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and support recovery; however, participation rates remain low. While institutional and system-level barriers have been widely examined, less is known about how individual patient factors influence engagement in aerobic exercise during rehabilitation. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether depressive symptoms, apathy, self-efficacy and outcome expectations for exercise, perceived barriers, or past exercise history were associated with aerobic exercise participation in stroke rehabilitation. Methods: In this prospective cohort sub-study, adults admitted to in- or out-patient stroke rehabilitation at three urban hospitals completed validated questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms, apathy, exercise self-efficacy, outcome expectations for exercise, perceived barriers to being active, and premorbid exercise history. Participants were separated into two groups for analysis: those who completed aerobic exercise during rehabilitation and those who did not. Equivalence testing and between-group comparisons were performed. Results: Sixty-two participants were enrolled; 16 participated in aerobic exercise and 46 did not. Groups were not equivalent on any individual-level factors. Compared to non-participants, those who performed aerobic exercise had significantly higher depressive symptom scores (p=0.0025) and lower self-efficacy for exercise (p=0.0087). Non-participants demonstrated significantly higher apathy (p=0.0007). No significant differences were found for outcome expectations, perceived barriers, or exercise history. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms and lower self-efficacy did not impede aerobic exercise participation during rehabilitation. Increased apathy, however, was associated with non-participation. Findings highlight the need for individually tailored aerobic exercise prescriptions that consider motivational and affective factors to optimize engagement during stroke rehabilitation.

Background: Heatwrap is recommended for acute low back pain (ALBP), and previous research found heatwrap plus exercise more effective than each intervention alone. While recommended by clinical guidelines, their impact on mechanistic outcomes is unknown. This trial aimed to (i) assess immediate and short-term effects of heatwrap alone or combined with exercise, compared with a sham heatwrap, on pain sensitivity, lumbar muscle activity, current pain intensity, and trunk flexion range of motion, and (ii) explore whether changes in pain sensitivity and lumbar muscle activity are associated with changes in clinical symptoms from baseline to 1-week follow-up. Methods: A randomised controlled trial took place at a single research center. Of 315 individuals screened for eligibility, 99 adults with ALBP were recruited and assigned to one of three intervention groups: heatwrap plus exercise (n=34), heatwrap alone (n=33) or sham heatwrap (n=32). Interventions were applied for one hour at the first visit, and immediate effects were measured. Then, interventions were applied for 7 days, and short-term effects were measured at 1-week follow-up. Outcomes included pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, flexion-relaxation ratio, trunk range of motion and current pain intensity. Results: Heatwrap and exercise did not produce greater effects over time than heatwrap alone or a sham heatwrap on all outcomes, and changes in sensorimotor outcomes at one week were not associated with changes in symptoms. Conclusions: Heatwrap and/or exercises did not influence specifically the potential sensorimotor mechanisms tested in individuals with ALBP. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT03986047

Background Mirror therapy (MT)-specifically paradigms using mirror visual feedback (MVF)-is widely used in neurorehabilitation; however, mechanistic implementations vary substantially in movement content, rhythmicity and attentional demands. This protocol describes an acute mechanistic, within-participant fNIRS screening study designed to compare three prespecified upper-limb mirror-therapy task paradigms and to quantify associated subjective experience after each condition in healthy adults during a single visit. Methods and analysis This is a single-centre, within-participant, randomised crossover study conducted at Wuhan Wuchang Hospital (Wuhan, China). Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will complete three task conditions once each in a counterbalanced order using a 3*3 Latin-square scheme: UMT1 (task-oriented rhythmic functional movement), UMT2 (open-ended free movement with auditory control), and UMT3 (non-functional rhythmic movement). fNIRS will be acquired using the NirSmart-6000A system during a standardised block design. The primary outcome is ROI-level HbO activation quantified as GLM-derived {beta} estimates within the prespecified primary ROIs (bilateral SM1/M1 and bilateral PMC). Secondary outcomes include ROI-level windowed {Delta}HbO (5-20 s post-onset relative to the immediately preceding rest; descriptive only), ROI-level {Delta}HbR, and post-condition subjective ratings (illusion, immersion, confusion and fatigue; 1-7 Likert). Condition effects will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for condition and period and prespecified multiplicity-adjusted pairwise contrasts. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Approval No.: 2025-112-01; approved on 2025-08-21). The study is expected to be minimal risk. Findings will be disseminated through publication of this protocol manuscript and subsequent results manuscripts and conference presentations. Trial registration number Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600116634). This study is conducted as a prespecified mechanistic sub-study under the overarching registered project.

Background and purpose: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a multifaceted condition where proximal, local, and distal factors may contribute to symptoms and limitations. How these factors collectively contribute to PFPS remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study compared proximal, local, and distal mechanical characteristics between individuals with and without PFPS and investigated their association with pain intensity and functional disability. Methods: Eighty participants were included: 40 individuals with unilateral or bilateral PFPS, 40 healthy controls. Isometric muscle strength of hip, trunk, and ankle was assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Joint alignment (Q-angle, rearfoot angle, pelvic tilt) and muscle flexibility (iliotibial band, hamstrings, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, and soleus) were measured using standard clinical techniques. Pain severity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and functional disability was evaluated using the Kujala score. Results: Individuals with PFPS showed reduced iliotibial band flexibility, decreased hamstring and soleus length, lower hip abductor strength, and greater anterior and lateral pelvic tilt (all p < 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified reduced iliotibial band flexibility (OR = 7.48) and greater anterior pelvic tilt (OR = 11.75) as independent associates of PFPS. Anterior pelvic tilt predicted pain severity, while anterior trunk muscle strength and Q-angle predicted disability. Discussion: Reduced iliotibial band flexibility and increased anterior pelvic tilt were independently associated with PFPS, while anterior pelvic tilt predicted pain severity and anterior trunk muscle strength and Q-angle predicted functional disability. Clinical assessment and rehabilitation of PFPS should therefore extend beyond the knee to include iliotibial band flexibility, pelvic alignment, and trunk muscle strength.

Purpose: Lower-limb prosthesis use involves interacting physical, psychosocial, and device-related outcomes that may not be fully captured by conventional clinical assessment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a stakeholder-informed framework of outcome domains relevant to meaningful everyday prosthesis use. Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods participatory design comprised a structured synthesis of selected clinically relevant content from five established patient-reported outcome measures; semi-structured interviews and importance and actionability ratings with 18 contributors (12 prosthesis users, four clinicians, and two industrial partners); and integration of the synthesis, qualitative, and rating findings. Interview records were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and ratings were analysed descriptively. Results: The resulting framework comprised four interrelated domains: Mobility, Physical Function, Psychosocial Wellbeing, and Prosthesis Experience. Mobility showed the clearest convergence across stakeholder perspectives. Prosthesis users showed the largest importance actionability gap for Prosthesis Experience (4.5 vs 3.0), whereas clinicians showed the largest gap for Psychosocial Wellbeing (5.0 vs 3.0). Interviews highlighted day-to-day variability in prosthesis use and the influence of confidence, fatigue, comfort, environmental conditions, social context, and device usability. Conclusions: Meaningful outcome assessment in prosthetic rehabilitation should extend beyond mobility alone to consider physical function, psychosocial wellbeing, and prosthesis experience within everyday contexts. The proposed framework provides a stakeholder-informed foundation for multidimensional outcome assessment in prosthetic rehabilitation.

Breast cancer survivors frequently experience upper-limb impairments, making continuous monitoring essential for effective rehabilitation. We propose REINA (Recognize-Then-Infer Wearable-to-App AI Framework), a two-stage deep-learning approach for remote monitoring of motor function during breast cancer rehabilitation using wearable-device data. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals from wearable devices are first used to recognize physical activities via supervised learning, followed by an activity-specific recurrent neural network (RNN) to infer corresponding electromyography (EMG) signals. REINA establishes reliable inference of neuromuscular activity from wearable IMU data, enabling real-time, cost-effective assessment of motor function recovery in real-world settings.

Background: Fluctuations in pain intensity are intrinsic to non-specific chronic low back pain (nsCLBP). Nevertheless, pain fluctuations have rarely been considered when investigating pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, a novel study protocol was developed and implemented to systematically assess the impact of fluctuating pain states on pain-related measures. Methods: The final study cohort consisted of 45 nsCLBP patients and 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Patients participated in three visits, conducted during different pain states (i.e. clinically relevant pain, low-intensity clinical pain / pain-free, clinically irrelevant pain induced using a Qutenza 8% capsaicin patch). Pain fluctuations were monitored through online assessments every four days and guided the pseudorandomized visit scheduling. HCs participated in a single visit. Each study visit comprised a multimodal battery of pain-related measures. Results: 93.33% of patients completed all three visit types in a pseudorandomized order (chi-squared=1.50, p=0.826). Visit scheduling was possible due to the high self-report adherence (median=93.48%), unrelated to self-report burden (rho=-0.097, p=0.53). Study visits were conducted during different pain states, as indicated by: i) the significantly higher low back pain intensity in the clinically relevant pain visit (mean[SD]: 3.98[0.90]), compared to the low-intensity clinical pain (1.03[0.86]) and clinically irrelevant pain (1.13[0.82]) visits (p-values<0.001), as well as by ii) the successful induction of a moderate-to-high clinically irrelevant pain across assessments. Conclusion: Despite scheduling complexity and pain state transition uncertainty, a pain state-dependent pseudorandomized study design is feasible and could improve the understanding of nsCLBP mechanisms.

Background The time trend in long-term survival after a stroke is to some extent unknow due to (relatively) short follow up periods in available data. The objective of this study is to identify and quantify differences in long-term stroke survival in Sweden between men and women and patients with different attained educational levels, comparing two time-periods, 2000-2009 and 2010-2022. Methods This study employs total population Swedish register data pertaining to hospital-based care and mortality due to stroke for the period 2000-2022 in order to estimate survival (all-cause mortality) after ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, respectively, and pertaining to attained educational level. Kaplan-Meier survival functions are estimated stratifying for time-period, sex and educational level. Cox regressions are employed to quantify mortality hazard ratios between the strata. Age is taken into account in complementary analyses (supplement). Results Taking only time-period (2000-2009 vs 2010-2022) into account resulted in significantly higher survival in the second period for ischaemic stroke patients (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.83-0.84), while no significant difference could be detected for haemorrhagic stroke. Stratifying for sex showed that men gained more than women in terms of reduced mortality hazard rate between the periods. Further stratifying by educational level and estimating survival separately for men and women showed that, for both men and women, patients with the lowest education were relatively worse off (compared to patients with higher education) in the second period. Further analyses, taking age into account, reversed the relative hazard ratio between men and women, but corroborated the result that low education is associated with poorer outcome than high education. Conclusions The results suggest that there are considerable differences in expected long-term survival after stroke between the sexes, but that this may be due to differences in age between the sexes at the time of stroke. Moreover, lower educational level is significantly associated with lower long-time survival.

This study aimed to quantify the longitudinal tracking and cross-sectional construct validity of a single-item questionnaire measuring recreational physical activity frequency (RPAF) in the Womens Healthy Ageing Project. At baseline, 474 participants aged 45-55 reported RPAF from 1993 to 2014. Longitudinal tracking of the RPAF item was assessed as a consecutive-wave and baseline-referenced measure using linear weighted kappa (LWK), Spearman correlations, exact agreement and within-one-category agreement. Construct validity in the form of convergent and known-group validity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) leisure activity domains, Short Form 36 physical function (SF-36-PF) subscale, Timed Up and Go (TUG), hand grip strength (HGS) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). 474 participants provided baseline RPAF data. Pairwise longitudinal samples ranged from 176 to 459 across the study. Consecutive-wave LWK ranged from 0.38 to 0.49, and Spearman correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.57. Exact and within-category agreement ranged from 41.4%-50.8% and 72.0%-79.0%. Baseline-referenced LWK ranged from 0.22 to 0.47, with Spearman correlations of 0.29 to 0.56. RPAF correlated with total IPAQ leisure score (rs = 0.60), IPAQ walking score (rs = 0.58), SF-36-PF (rs = 0.33) and TUG score (rs = -0.25). No significant correlation was identified between RPAF, HGS or WhTR. RPAF discriminated known groups for WHO guideline-sufficient activity, SF-36-PF, and TUG fall risk. The RPAF item demonstrated fair-to-moderate agreement in consecutive waves, with weaker baseline-referenced tracking. Cross-sectional validity was highest with total IPAQ leisure activity. The item may provide a pragmatic measure for RPAF in womens cohort studies.

Background: Newly available arm angle data offers a new dimension to understand rising rates of arm injury in MLB pitchers. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between arm angle, pitch characteristics, and elbow and forearm injury in MLB pitchers.<br><br> Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020 to 2025 and MLB injured list (IL) data were used to evaluate arm angle and pitch characteristics in relation to elbow and forearm injuries. Results are presented with and without requirements on prior season workload and for same-season and next-season injury incidence. A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to capture non-linear dependence and interactions between selected features and injury incidence to the elbow or forearm. Average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effect terms. Results: N = 3,812 pitcher-seasons were included. 29% pitchers who underwent UCLR did so in the same season as a forearm injury (tmean=44, tmedian=27 days to surgery). Arm angle, fastball usage, and their interaction were the three most predictive features. Arm angle was positively related to incidence of injury (ORmeanAME=1.014), fastball usage was inversely related to incidence of injury (ORmeanAME=0.243), and arm angle moderated the effect fastball usage at high arm angle, where increased usage was no longer protective. Slider velocity (ORmeanAME=1.072), spin rate (ORmeanAME=1.001), and usage (ORmeanAME=2.039) also significantly predicted injury risk. Fastball velocity was not significant in any fit, with ORmeanAME=0.999 across all fits. Fit-level Nagelkerke R2 values ranged from .019 to .052. Conclusion: Fastball usage and arm angle, not velocity, predicted elbow and forearm injury risk among MLB pitchers, and arm angle was the single most predictive feature. The heterogeneity of risk factors as a function of arm angle, and the novelty of MLB arm angle data, may explain why fastball usage has been previously underexplored as a risk factor. Keywords: baseball; arm angle; fastball velocity; fastball usage; spin rate; UCL; ulnar collateral ligament; elbow injury; forearm injury; Statcast

Static force plates (FP) are the gold standard for measuring ground reaction forces (GRF) and computing joint moments through inverse dynamics in gait analysis. However, they are restricted to controlled environments, and the number of steps analyzed is limited by the plates embedded in the floor. To address these limitations, portable solutions such as sensorized insoles, socks, or shoes have emerged. Yet, creating wearable systems capable of measuring three-dimensional GRF in real-world conditions remains challenging. Current sensorized shoes often incorporate thick sensors (up to 2 cm), reducing usability and limiting their application in pathological populations or dynamic tasks like running. This study evaluates the usability of ShokacShoes, a novel sensorized shoe integrating three thin, three-dimensional force sensors, and explores its potential as a Wearable Force Plate (WFP). Eight healthy participants performed slow, natural, and fast walking using two insole configurations. Force and temporal metrics were derived from WFP and FP data. Results indicate that WFP enables accurate step segmentation and detects significant effects of speed and insole type on temporal and force metrics, confirming its reliability under different walking conditions. Comparisons with FP revealed differences in force metrics and signal morphology, though temporal parameters remained consistent. These results are likely due to sensor quantity and positioning. Thereby, ShokacShoes represent a valid solution capable of measuring three-dimensional forces within commercial footwear. Future work will focus on validating the applicability of a new version of ShokacShoes against gold-standard FP in a comprehensive validation study involving diverse real-world scenarios and pathological conditions.

Purpose: Identifying head impacts linked to brain injury in sport remains challenging. Instrumented mouthguards quantify head-impact kinematics, and finite element (FE) modelling can transform these data into brain strain estimates, which may better reflect injury risk than kinematics alone. Here, we examined associations between mouthguard-measured kinematics, FE-derived strain, and plasma brain injury biomarker GFAP following head impacts. Methods: We analysed 41 video-verified impacts from male Australian football players, including 22 assessed for concussion (17 diagnosed) and 19 unassessed. Instrumented mouthguards recorded peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration, and peak rotational velocity (PRV). Brain strain was estimated using the Imperial College FE brain model, and plasma GFAP was quantified using Simoa. Biomechanical-GFAP associations were examined using Spearman correlations and segmented regression. Results: For impacts overall, plasma GFAP was moderately correlated with PLA ({rho}=0.46, 95% CI: 0.20-0.66), PRV ({rho}=0.53, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78), and strain ({rho}=0.60, 95% CI: 0.32-0.80). Associations were stronger within concussion cases for strain ({rho}=0.86, 95% CI: 0.58-0.97) and PRV ({rho}=0.64, 95% CI: 0.15-0.93). Piecewise regression identified strain levels above which strain-GFAP relationships steepened across the whole-brain and brainstem. In concussion cases, supra-threshold brainstem strain was associated with greater symptoms. Conclusion: Finite element brain strain may better predict brain injury risk following a sport-related head impact than peak acceleration metrics. Stronger associations with plasma GFAP, particularly among concussion cases, and evidence of a biomechanical threshold, support the use of biomarker-informed strain measures in future risk modelling and the development of brain injury screening thresholds.

Background: Sweeping sliders with large horizontal break are hypothesized to be associated with arm injury, and prior work suggests a link between slider usage, arm angle, and injury. Purpose: To evaluate whether arm angle and slider horizontal movement are associated with elbow or forearm injury risk in MLB pitchers. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020-2025 and injury data were used to study the relationship between sliders and arm injuries. Pitchers with at least 30 innings pitched (IP) were evaluated for same- and next-season injury incidence to the Elbow, Forearm, or Elbow/Forearm. A generalized additive model (GAM) related pitch-level variables to injury incidence, and average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effects. Results: All fits were significant at p<.01. Fits for same-season (N=1,957, p=.00008, R2=.066) and next-season (N=2,511, p=.00005, R2=.053) Elbow/Forearm injury were significant at p<.001. Same-season (R2=.061) and next-season (R2=.055) Forearm injury fits had p=.001. Main effects for slider glove-side movement and fastball usage, their interactions with arm angle, and arm angle main effects were the most predictive features. Across the three fits where the slider glove-side movement main effect was significant, odds ratios ranged from 1.03 to 1.07, meaning that each additional inch of slider glove-side movement was associated with a 3% to 7% increase in the observed injury incidence. Furthermore, this effect was magnified at high arm angle and muted at low arm angle. Conclusion: We observed that slider horizontal movement, arm angle, and their interaction were significantly associated with incidence of Forearm and combined Elbow/Forearm injury. This effect was weak or non-existent at low arm angles and strong at high arm angles, suggesting that arm angle moderates the risk of slider horizontal movement, and providing evidence that sliders with large horizontal break (e.g. sweepers) may pose an injury risk. Keywords: baseball; sweeper; slider; arm angle; horizontal movement; elbow injury; forearm injury

Background: The relative merits of infrainguinal bypass and primary major lower limb amputation (MLLA) for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) remain uncertain, and the baseline profiles of patients selected for each strategy are poorly described. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022356094). MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 2025. Prospective studies of adults with CLTI undergoing primary infrainguinal bypass or primary MLLA were eligible. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and subsequent amputation outcomes were synthesised using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. Baseline comorbidity profiles were also extracted. Results: Twenty-seven studies involving 6,576 patients were included: 5,779 underwent infrainguinal bypass and 797 underwent MLLA. After bypass, pooled mortality was 3.7% at 30 days (95% CI 2.8%-4.9%, I2 = 49.4%), 18.5% at 1 year (95% CI 15.6%-21.9%, I2 = 62.3%), and 54.3% at 5 years (95% CI 50.5%-58.0%, I2 = 0%). After MLLA, pooled mortality was 9.2% at 30 days (95% CI 4.1%-19.3%, I2 = 73.5%), 28.5% at 1 year (95% CI 13.3%-51.0, I2 = 70.8%), and 39.9% at 2 years (95% CI 0.3%-99.3, I2 = 90.5%), although longer-term estimates were limited by sparse data and marked heterogeneity. Thirty-day MACE was 6.5% (95% CI 4.3%-9.7, I2 = 63.5%) after bypass and 2.8% after MLLA (95% CI 0.1%-37.6%, I2 = 0%). Early subsequent major amputation after bypass occurred in 3.9% of patients (95% CI 2.0%-7.7%, I2 = 91.2%), rising to 16.2% at 1 year (95% CI 12.6%-20.5%, I2 = 82.0%) and 33.3% at 3 years (95% CI 20.1%-49.8%, I2 = 0%). Early re-amputation after MLLA occurred in 10.9% of patients (95% CI 4.5%-24.4%, I2 = 40.3%). Baseline comorbidity burden was high in both groups, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Conclusions: CLTI carries a poor prognosis regardless of treatment strategy. Infrainguinal bypass is associated with lower early mortality and better early limb preservation than primary MLLA, but long-term survival remains poor and later limb failure is common. Primary MLLA is not a low-risk alternative. Better contemporary comparative evidence utilising modern causal inference approaches is needed to support individualised decision-making.

Background: Exclusive breastfeeding may protect infants against common infections and support healthy growth and development. Working mothers may face constraints on exclusive breastfeeding arising from work schedules, separation from their infants, and inadequate breastfeeding support. National evidence on the individual, healthcare-related, and contextual factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding among working Ghanaian mothers appears to remain limited. Design: Cross-sectional secondary analysis. Setting: Nationally representative survey covering urban and rural communities across all 16 administrative regions of Ghana. Participants: The analysis included 620 currently working mothers whose youngest living infants were aged 0-5 completed months and lived with them. The complete-case multivariable analysis included 619 mother-infant pairs. Primary outcome measure: Current exclusive breastfeeding, defined using the standard 24-hour infant-feeding indicator. Infants were classified as exclusively breastfed when they received breast milk without water, formula, animal milk, other liquids, or solid or semi-solid foods during the preceding day or night. Oral rehydration solution, vitamins, minerals and prescribed medicines were permitted. Aim: To estimate the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and examine its individual, healthcare-related and contextual correlates among working mothers of infants aged 0-5 months in Ghana. Methods: Birth Recode data from the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey were analysed. Unweighted frequencies and survey-weighted percentages described the study population. Design-adjusted Wald tests assessed bivariate associations. Survey-weighted binary logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), accounting for sampling weights, primary sampling units, and strata. Results: The survey-weighted prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 54.3% (95% CI: 49.2-59.3). Ethnicity, mode of delivery, region, and community poverty appeared to be statistically significant in the bivariate analyses. In the adjusted model, region was jointly associated with exclusive breastfeeding (p = 0.004). Mothers in the Northern (AOR = 4.93; 95% CI: 1.5-16.17) and Savannah (AOR = 4.22; 95% CI: 1.08-16.41) regions had higher odds than mothers in the Western Region. Mothers in low-education communities had lower odds than those in high-education communities (AOR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.30-0.98). Although Guan mothers had higher odds than Akan mothers, the overall association with ethnicity was non-significant, and the estimate appeared imprecise. Maternal age, individual education, religion, parity, wealth, infant sex, antenatal care, postnatal care, and residence were not independently associated with exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusion: The prevalence estimate suggests that slightly more than half of working mothers exclusively breastfed their infants. Regional and community differences appeared more pronounced than those associated with most measured individual characteristics. Regionally responsive breastfeeding support and practical community education may contribute to improved coverage. Workplace recommendations require further evidence because employment conditions were not measured directly. Keywords: Exclusive breastfeeding; working mothers; infant feeding; maternal employment; regional inequalities; community education; Ghana; 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey; survey-weighted analysis.

Background: Systematic reviews of clinical prediction models increasingly include studies using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods alongside traditional multivariable regression approaches. A previously published Excel tool enabled standardised data extraction using the CHARMS checklist and risk of bias assessment using PROBAST. The recent publication of the PROBAST+AI framework, which distinguishes the assessment of model development quality from the assessment of model evaluation risk of bias and assesses applicability in both parts, necessitates an updated digital instrument applicable across prediction modelling methods. Methods: We updated an open-access Excel tool to incorporate the full PROBAST+AI framework. The updated template incorporates structural separation between assessment of model development quality and model evaluation risk of bias, with applicability assessed in both parts. It also incorporates updated signalling questions, including those addressing methodological issues particularly relevant to AI/ML, and automates the generation of summary tables and graphical displays. Results: The updated tool (CHARMS & PROBAST+AI Template) contains 11 worksheets and supports data extraction and appraisal for up to 30 prediction models. Dedicated, linked worksheets enable separate assessment of model development and model evaluation, with Domain 4 distinguishing among Apparent, Internal, and External evaluation settings. Key updates include dedicated assessments for predictor pre-processing, class imbalance handling and recalibration, data leakage prevention, and replication of the full model development pipeline within resampling procedures. Automated sheets dynamically format tables and summary charts covering PROBAST+AI parts. Conclusions: The CHARMS & PROBAST+AI Excel template provides a standardised, user-friendly, and rigorous digital framework for systematic reviewers appraising traditional statistical and AI-driven clinical prediction models.

Background: Fibrosis, characterised by excessive accumulation of collagen type I (COL1), is a common feature of chronic diseases, including liver diseases (LDs), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). COL1 degradation products can be detected in urine by proteomics/ peptidomics analyses and may serve as non-invasive biomarkers of fibrosis. We aimed to identify a common molecular signature of fibrosis across these diseases that may ultimately guide interventions to slow disease progression and prevent organ damage. Methods: Using capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS), naturally occurring COL1 degradation products (peptides) in the urine of patients with fibrotic disease, LDs (n=127), CKD (n=263) or HF (n=187), were investigated and compared with the same number of matched controls. Disease-associated COL1 peptides were identified separately for each condition, and peptides showing consistent associations across the three diseases were selected to define a common fibrosis signature. A support vector machine model based on the selected peptides was developed and validated in independent cohorts of patients with LDs (n=110), CKD (n=93), HF (n=32) and controls (n=643). Results: We identified a common fibrotic signature consisting of 50 COL1 degradation products, mainly downregulated in fibrosis. A model based on these peptides achieved a strong performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.935 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.917-0.953, p<0.0001) in an external validation cohort comprising pooled disease groups (LDs, CKD, and HF) and controls. Performance was maintained in LDs, CKD and HF, with AUCs of 0.917 (95% CI 0.890-0.944, p<0.0001), 0.951 (95% CI 0.931-0.971, p<0.0001) and 0.950 (95% CI 0.903-0.997, p<0.0001), respectively. The model scores were significantly associated with fibrosis stage in LDs (p=0.0097) and with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in CKD (p=0.045). Conclusion: A model of urinary COL1 peptides captures a shared collagen degradation signature across organs and diseases, enabling the non-invasive assessment of fibrosis irrespective of its origin. As these peptides exclusively reflect collagen degradation, the findings suggest impaired collagen degradation as a driver in fibrosis. Future clinical studies are warranted to evaluate the utility of this model for early fibrosis detection and earlier implementation of anti-fibrotic interventions.

Objective: To determine whether paradoxical relief, feeling unusually better after a seizure compared to before it, is more common after functional/dissociative seizures (FDS) than epileptic seizures (ES), quantify its diagnostic accuracy, and explore its relationship with preictal symptoms. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary epilepsy unit for prolonged inpatient EEG monitoring underwent a structured clinical interview on admission, before final multidisciplinary diagnostic classification. Preictal dissociative and autonomic/somatic symptom burden was assessed using items adapted from established questionnaires. Diagnostic classification incorporated clinical history, seizure semiology, video electroencephalography findings, and collateral information. Patients with dual or indeterminate diagnoses were excluded. Associations with paradoxical relief were examined using logistic regression, followed by an exploratory mediation analysis. Results: Of 176 patients assessed, 66 with FDS and 65 with ES were included. Paradoxical relief was reported by 46/66 patients with FDS (69.7%) and 10/65 with ES (15.4%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 12.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.57 to 31.09). As a diagnostic signal for FDS, paradoxical relief had 69.7% sensitivity (95% CI 57.1 to 80.4), 84.6% specificity (95% CI 73.5 to 92.4), a positive likelihood ratio of 4.53 (2.51 to 8.19), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.36 (0.24 to 0.52). FDS diagnosis remained independently associated with paradoxical relief after adjustment (OR 10.59, 95% CI 3.42 to 38.06). In a parallel mediation analysis, dissociative symptom burden showed a significant indirect effect, accounting for 19.5% of the association between diagnostic group and relief, whereas the indirect effect through somatic/autonomic symptom burden was not significant. Significance: Paradoxical relief is substantially more common after FDS than ES and may provide a simple, clinically useful diagnostic signal. Its absence does not exclude FDS, and the finding requires external validation. The association with dissociative symptoms is exploratory and supports prospective investigation of whether relief reflects transient resolution of a disturbed, disembodied preictal state.

Objective: Whether a scheduled antiseizure medication (ASM) continues on schedule across the ICU-to-floor transfer has not been characterized. We quantified ASM administration-gap frequency across this transfer and compared it with gap frequency during matched non-transfer intervals in the same patient and drug. Methods: In this retrospective MIMIC-IV (version 3.1) cohort study, we identified epilepsy and status-epilepticus admissions with an ICU stay followed by floor transfer and a scheduled ASM order active at ICU departure. A gap was defined as an interval exceeding 1.5 times the expected dosing interval between the last ICU dose and first floor dose, or no further dose before discharge, and compared with a matched non-transfer control interval in the same patient and drug (paired McNemar test). A multivariable model evaluated six prespecified clinical predictors; sociodemographic variables were summarized descriptively. Results: Among 2,469 ASM transition-by-drug observations (1,583 admissions, 1,335 patients), an administration gap occurred in 251 (10.2%; 95% CI, 8.7%-11.7%). Gap frequency across the transfer exceeded frequency during matched non-transfer control intervals in the same patient and drug: a paired rate difference of 5.8 percentage points (95% CI, 4.4-7.1; 7.5% vs 1.7%; P = 7.3 x 10^-22) before the transfer and 6.4 percentage points (95% CI, 4.9-7.9; 8.9% vs 2.5%; P = 1.9 x 10^-23) after. Gap rates were similar for intravenous-available (9.9%) and oral-only (11.4%) drugs (rate difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 4.5; P = .34). None of six prespecified predictors reached significance after correction. Significance: An antiseizure medication administration gap occurred in approximately 1 of every 10 drug-transition observations at the ICU-to-floor transfer, exceeding matched non-transfer gap rates by 5.8 to 6.4 percentage points. This transfer-associated excess, rather than any single medication or patient characteristic, supports a structured medication-continuity check.

Background VEXAS syndrome is a late onset autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic UBA1 mutations and characterized by heterogeneous systemic and hematologic manifestations. We aimed to describe all identified Belgian cases through a national multicenter cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective study across four Belgian tertiary centers. Clinical, biological, genetic, therapeutic, and outcome data were collected using standardized anonymized case report forms. Analyses were descriptive. Results Twenty-one male patients were identified between January 2018 and May 2025. General symptoms such as Fatigue, weight loss and sweating occurred in 95% of cases. The most frequent manifestations were cutaneous (85.7%), hematologic (76.2%), articular (66.7%), thromboembolic (57.1%), chondritis (42.9%), ophthalmologic (38.1%), pulmonary (38.1%). Other manifestations also included vasculitis (61.9%). At diagnosis, 95% had anemia, macrocytic in 57%, and 28.6% had thrombocytopenia. Corticosteroids were the main first line therapy. Second line treatments included anti IL 6 agents (46.7%), JAK inhibitors (20%), and azacitidine (14.3%). Complete remission occurred in 50% of patients receiving anti IL 6 therapy and in 33% treated with either JAK inhibitors or azacitidine. Two patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation, one died from infectious complications. Twenty six infectious episodes were recorded, including opportunistic infections. Six patients (28.6%) died during follow-up, four from infectious complications. Conclusion This first Belgian national cohort confirms the clinical heterogeneity of VEXAS syndrome and highlights substantial infectious morbidity and mortality. Access to targeted second-line therapies, particularly anti IL-6 agents and JAK inhibitors, remains challenging despite apparent clinical benefit.